The State after
Statism: Economic and Social Policy in the Global Age
Jonah Levy of UC Berkeley, Project Leader
Its central purpose is to explore the changing place of the state
in the economic and social arena. The debate on this issue has been
dominated by two equally unsatisfactory positions. A first camp
argues that changes in the economy, technology, and society are
driving a rollback of state intervention. A second camp counters
that the pressures for change are weaker and the sources of inertia
stronger than suggested by the first camp. Both approaches share
the presumption that contemporary changes push in a single direction,
toward the reduction in state intervention. This group hopes to
advance an alternative understanding that sees state intervention
as more than an eroding historical legacy. Project participants
will investigate the following hypotheses:
- Economic, technological, and social change is a dual-edge sword.
While some changes challenge existing forms of state intervention,
others may fuel new demands for state intervention.
- State intervention is a moving target. If old forms of intervention
are discredited and cleared away, new forms of regulation are also emerging.
- Politics is creative, not simply reactive. Politics does more than defend
an ever-smaller and less-relevant set of interventions; it also forges
new policies to meet new challenges and needs.
This group will hold a first workshop in Spring, 2002. Participants
will submit short, five-page outlines before the workshop that will
be discussed and debated by all participants. Two additional workshops
will be held in December 2002 and May, 2003. Drafts of the essays
will be presented and critiqued at each session. While the early
workshops will be closed working sessions, the May 2003 workshop
will be an open, public conference. Papers will be published first
in the Institute's Working Paper series and then collected in one
or two edited volumes published by a major university press in the
year 2004.